
Market Access & HEOR
Approval Is
Only Half the Battle.
HTA dossiers for NICE, HAS, IQWiG and PBAC. HEOR study design, value dossiers, payer engagement and RWE strategy — embedded into your evidence plan from Phase II, not bolted on at launch.

Reimbursement Built In From Phase II
Approval gets you a label. Reimbursement gets you patients. The teams that recognise the difference design their Phase II SAPs with payer requirements already in mind — not as a downstream activity, but as a design constraint.
Vigilare's Evidence-to-Reimbursement™ approach embeds HEOR, value-story development and payer engagement into clinical and regulatory planning from the start. By the time the dossier lands at HTA, the evidence already speaks the payer's language.
- HTA dossiers delivered into NICE, HAS, IQWiG, PBAC and CADTH
- HEOR and economic-modelling expertise embedded from Phase II
- Value dossiers and global value propositions co-authored with medical
- RWE strategy spanning protocol to post-launch evidence generation
Every Access Function. Designed In From Day One.
Six integrated market-access capabilities, delivered by named senior strategists — designed to win reimbursement, not just approval.
HTA Dossiers
NICE, HAS, IQWiG (G-BA), PBAC, CADTH, AOTMiT submissions. Country-specific reference cases, comparator selection, evidence requirements.
HEOR Study Design
Cost-effectiveness models, budget-impact analyses, indirect treatment comparisons, network meta-analyses, MAIC and STC studies.
Value Dossiers
Global value dossiers (GVDs), country adaptations, AMCP-formatted US payer dossiers, value-message frameworks aligned to PICOS.
Payer Engagement
Advisory boards, payer interviews, mock HTA committee panels, early scientific advice and pre-submission stakeholder mapping.
RWE Strategy & Generation
RWE design, retrospective database studies, prospective registries, post-launch evidence generation, claims-data analytics.
Early Access Programs
Named-patient supply, compassionate use, ATU (France), expanded access (US), early access scheme (UK), conditional reimbursement.
From Landscape to Optimised Access
A five-stage market-access framework that turns evidence into reimbursement — and reimbursement into patient reach.
Landscape
Stakeholder mapping, comparator analysis, HTA-body requirements, pricing benchmarks.
Evidence Plan
Gap analysis vs payer requirements, evidence generation roadmap, HEOR design.
Dossier
GVD, country dossiers, economic models, ITC/NMA, AMCP formats.
Engage
Mock HTA panels, early scientific advice, payer ad-boards, agency liaison.
Optimise
Post-launch RWE, conditional reimbursement reviews, label-extension support.
Integrated, Not Bolted On at Launch.
Four reasons biopharma sponsors choose Vigilare for global market access.
Designed In From Phase II
Our MA team sits at the protocol-design table — comparator and endpoint choices reflect payer requirements, not just regulatory ones.
Direct HTA Submission Experience
Dossiers submitted directly into NICE, HAS, G-BA (IQWiG), PBAC and CADTH — including STA, MTA and rapid-access pathways.
In-House Economic Modelling
CEA, BIA, MAIC and NMA built by senior health economists on our team — not outsourced and reformatted at the end.
Connected to Reg + Clinical
Same team as your reg and clinical workstreams — value story, clinical evidence and regulatory positioning stay in lockstep.
Market Access, Answered.
01
When should we start market-access planning?
The latest you should start is end-of-Phase-I; the optimal time is during Phase I planning. Comparator selection and endpoint design choices made in Phase II are nearly impossible to fix retrospectively at HTA — and they are the things that most often kill reimbursement.
02
Which HTA agencies have you submitted to directly?
Direct submission experience with NICE (UK), HAS (France), IQWiG / G-BA (Germany), PBAC (Australia) and CADTH / pCODR (Canada), plus AOTMiT (Poland), TLV (Sweden), AIFA (Italy) and SMC (Scotland) for select indications.
03
Do you build economic models in-house?
Yes — CEA, BIA, partitioned survival, Markov, semi-Markov, MAIC and NMA all built by senior health economists on our team, in Excel or R as required by the target HTA body. We retain full IP and model documentation under client ownership.
04
Can you support pre-submission payer interactions?
Yes — we run mock HTA committee panels, payer ad-boards (US managed care, EU national payers, regional sick funds), early scientific advice with NICE / HAS / G-BA, and full pre-submission stakeholder mapping.
05
Do you handle US AMCP-format dossiers?
Yes. AMCP-format dossiers, US payer value tools, IDN-specific budget impact, and post-launch managed-entry agreements all delivered in-house. We also support 340B and Medicaid coverage strategy.
Pair MA with the Full Lifecycle
Bundle market access with safety, regulatory, clinical and quality — one team, one quality system.
Ready to design for reimbursement, not just approval?
Speak to a senior market-access lead — not a sales rep. We'll map your payer pathway and propose an evidence plan in one focused call.